Skip to content
TransparencyLow

Towards Auditing AI Systems in the Wild

Occurred
Jun 15, 2026
Published
Jun 15, 2026
Source
arXiv

Summary

AI systems are increasingly deployed in real-world settings where their behavior is shaped by dynamic environments, evolving data distributions, and complex interactions with users and infrastructure. Traditional machine learning evaluation focuses on benchmarks and operates within sandboxed environments, providing only a limited view of the true system behavior in the wild. We argue for the development of principled auditing frameworks that monitor deployed AI systems throughout their lifecycle. We further propose framing auditing as a statistical problem of monitoring constraint violations under uncertainty, where desired properties (e.g., fairness and safety) are treated as risk-controlled constraints that must be continuously evaluated as systems evolve through iterative feedback. This perspective highlights the need for uncertainty-aware monitoring methods, socio-technical specifications of audit criteria, and auditing infrastructures that enable ongoing oversight of AI systems in the wild.

Classification

Category confidence: 90%
Severity confidence: 95%

Rationale: Research paper proposing auditing frameworks for AI systems without reporting a specific incident or harm.

Classifier: Qwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-FP8

Visit source