Can LLMs Hire Fairly? Racial Bias in Resume Screening
- Occurred
- Jun 27, 2026
- Published
- Jun 27, 2026
- Source
- arXiv
Summary
We audit fourteen mainstream large language models (LLMs) for hiring discrimination using the paired-resume methodology of Kline, Rose, and Walters (2022). The sole 2023-vintage model reproduces the pro-White callback gap documented in field experiments on labor market discrimination ($+2.12$ pp, significant at the 1\% level). Every model released in 2024 or after shows either a null gap or a significant pro-Black reversal (up to $-3.01$ pp). The same pattern holds on the gender axis. Based on 24,024 paired postings per model across 14 models, our results document a reversal in the direction of algorithmic hiring bias across model generations.
Classification
Rationale: Research study documenting racial and gender bias in LLM resume screening outcomes.
Classifier: Qwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-FP8