Skip to content
LLMLow

Foundation Models for EEG Are Blind to Long-Range Temporal Correlations: A Spectral-Temporal Dissociation Behind Their Cross-Population Fragility

Occurred
Jul 23, 2026
Published
Jul 23, 2026
Source
arXiv

Summary

Objective. Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (FMs) are trained to reconstruct or contrastively align short patches, then pooled into a fixed embedding. We tested whether these embeddings retained the long-range temporal correlations (LRTC) quantified by the detrended-fluctuation-analysis (DFA) exponent of the alpha-band envelope, and whether it governs cross-population transfer. Approach. We probed five EEG FMs spanning raw-waveform and spectral-input architectures (REVE, LaBraM, BENDR, CBraMod, BIOT) on two out-of-distribution cohorts, comparing recovery of the DFA exponent against the static 1/f aperiodic slope. Order-preserving and residualization controls tested for pooling or aperiodic shadowing. A montage-harmonized, zero-shot transfer task compared the frozen embedding with the DFA exponent across three cohorts (adding a Western reference). Main results. None of the five FMs represented the LRTC in the temporal order. Raw-waveform models (REVE, LaBraM, BENDR) recovered neither the DFA exponent nor the 1/f slope (R^2 <= 0.12); for these three the probe is uninformative, so the dissociation is specific to the spectral-input models (CBraMod, BIOT), which recovered 1/f strongly (R^2 = 0.59-0.73) but not DFA across cohorts. A classical DFA feature recovered the exponent (R^2 = 0.32-0.38 against a 0.64 reliability ceiling), and LRTC was orthogonal to the aperiodic slope (r = -0.06). On cross-population transfer, the frozen REVE embedding did not beat chance (W to K, 0.45) and the dimensionless DFA exponent transferred directionally but not at family-wise significance; the other four did not uniformly replicate it. All five were dominated by a recording-site axis (decodable at 0.98-1.00 vs. 0.500 chance), whereas the DFA exponent they discard is site-robust (0.71).

Classification

Category confidence: 85%
Severity confidence: 90%

Rationale: Research paper analyzing technical limitations of EEG foundation models without concrete incident or harm.

Classifier: Qwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-FP8

Visit source